| |||
PhysioBank
|
Advanced Search |
Tour |
Mirrors How to Cite | Contributing | FAQ |
||
| |||

Fractal dynamics were recently detected in the apparently ``noisy'' variations in the stride interval of human walking. Dynamical analysis of these step-to-step fluctuations revealed a self-similar pattern: fluctuations at one time scale are statistically similar to those at multiple other time scales, at least over hundreds of steps, while healthy subjects walk at their normal rate. To study the stability of this fractal property, we analyzed data obtained from ten healthy subjects who walked for 1 hour at their usual, slow and fast paces. The stride interval fluctuations exhibited long-range correlations with power-law decay for up to a thousand strides at all three walking rates. In contrast, during metronomically-paced walking, these long-range correlations disappeared; variations in the stride interval were anti-correlated. The long-range correlations observed during spontaneous walking were not affected by removal of drifts in the time series. Thus, the fractal dynamics of spontaneous stride interval are normally quite robust and intrinsic to the locomotor system. Furthermore, this fractal property of neural output may be related to the higher nervous centers responsible for control of walking rhythm.
Stride interval fluctuations were studied in ten young, healthy men. Participants had no history of any neuromuscular, respiratory or cardiovascular disorders, and were taking no medications. Mean age was 21.7 years (range: 18-29 years). Height was 1.77 ± 0.08 meters (mean ± S.D.) and weight was 71.8 ± 10.7 kg. All subjects provided informed written consent.
Subjects walked continuously on level ground around an obstacle free, long (either 225 or 400 meters), approximately oval path and the stride interval was measured using ultra-thin, force sensitive switches taped inside one shoe. For more details, please see the accompanying publication.
Each subject was given an arbitrary id (si01, si02, ... si10). For each subject, there are six data files: normal (.norm), slow (.slow) and fast (.fast) walking for 1 hour each as well as walking in time to a metronome at normal (.metnrm), slow (.metslw) and fast (.metfst) paces.
We find robust long-range correlations during unconstrained walking at all three walking rates and anti-correlations during metronomic walking. What do you find? Are there other rate or condition dependent effects on the histogram or the dynamics?
For more information, please see:
Name Last modified Size Description
Parent Directory -
MD5SUMS 13-Jul-2005 02:27 2.8K
SHA1SUMS 13-Jul-2005 02:27 3.3K
SHA256SUMS 18-Sep-2007 12:40 4.9K
fig.png 16-Aug-2001 14:35 37K
fig.ps 16-Aug-2001 14:33 281K
si01.fast 17-Jan-2001 18:47 21K
si01.metfst 17-Jan-2001 18:47 11K
si01.metnrm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 9.7K
si01.metslw 17-Jan-2001 18:47 8.8K
si01.norm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 20K
si01.slow 17-Jan-2001 18:47 19K
si02.fast 17-Jan-2001 18:47 22K
si02.metfst 17-Jan-2001 18:47 10K
si02.metnrm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 11K
si02.metslw 17-Jan-2001 18:47 10K
si02.norm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 20K
si02.slow 17-Jan-2001 18:47 20K
si03.fast 17-Jan-2001 18:47 19K
si03.metfst 17-Jan-2001 18:47 11K
si03.metnrm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 9.7K
si03.metslw 17-Jan-2001 18:47 8.0K
si03.norm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 20K
si03.slow 17-Jan-2001 18:47 21K
si04.fast 17-Jan-2001 18:47 21K
si04.metfst 17-Jan-2001 18:47 11K
si04.metnrm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 10K
si04.metslw 17-Jan-2001 18:47 8.3K
si04.norm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 18K
si04.slow 17-Jan-2001 18:47 15K
si05.fast 17-Jan-2001 18:47 22K
si05.metfst 17-Jan-2001 18:47 11K
si05.metnrm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 9.3K
si05.metslw 17-Jan-2001 18:47 7.7K
si05.norm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 20K
si05.slow 17-Jan-2001 18:47 15K
si06.fast 17-Jan-2001 18:47 20K
si06.metfst 17-Jan-2001 18:47 8.4K
si06.metnrm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 9.6K
si06.metslw 17-Jan-2001 18:47 10K
si06.norm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 19K
si06.slow 17-Jan-2001 18:47 17K
si07.fast 17-Jan-2001 18:47 20K
si07.metfst 17-Jan-2001 18:47 10K
si07.metnrm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 10K
si07.metslw 17-Jan-2001 18:47 8.3K
si07.norm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 17K
si07.slow 17-Jan-2001 18:47 16K
si08.fast 17-Jan-2001 18:47 22K
si08.metfst 17-Jan-2001 18:47 10K
si08.metnrm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 8.4K
si08.metslw 17-Jan-2001 18:47 7.1K
si08.norm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 17K
si08.slow 17-Jan-2001 18:47 12K
si09.fast 17-Jan-2001 18:47 20K
si09.metfst 17-Jan-2001 18:47 9.9K
si09.metnrm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 9.2K
si09.metslw 17-Jan-2001 18:47 8.3K
si09.norm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 18K
si09.slow 17-Jan-2001 18:47 16K
si10.fast 17-Jan-2001 18:47 19K
si10.metfst 17-Jan-2001 18:47 9.4K
si10.metnrm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 9.0K
si10.metslw 17-Jan-2001 18:47 8.1K
si10.norm 17-Jan-2001 18:47 17K
si10.slow 17-Jan-2001 18:47 15K
| Send feedback about this page to PhysioNet |
|
Your comments and suggestions are welcome. We encourage you to use our feedback form to comment on this page. If you would like to receive a reply, please send your comments by email to webmaster@physionet.org, or post them to: MIT Room E25-505A 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 USA |
![]() |